Web thinktank-international.blogspot.com

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Mobile advertising: Intimacy and intrusion

It seems that mobile operators, after years of talk, are finally taking the idea of mobile advertising seriously. In the latest issue of Campaign magazine, Deborah Bonello talks to some of the advertisers (subscription required) who are hoping to take advantage of this trend and the potential for intimacy, targeting and tracking that the medium is able to offer. But just how intimate are consumers willing to get at this stage of the game? We’ve talked before about the close relationship that people have with their phones. It is this personal connection that offers the potential for powerful advertising reach. As Dusan Hamlin, the managing director at mobile marketing agency Inside explains "Mobile offers the ability to target an ad to the consumer by personal information such as age, sex, interest and location at any given time, plus the ability to bill for products and services." Watch out though for the “piss-off factor”. People tend to open and read all of their messages on their mobiles and they do not take too kindly to spam. Direct mobile advertising through SMS has been going on for some time now with less than ideal results. Our own research suggests that this kind of intrusive advertising is more likely to generate ill will towards its source than anything else. So will more accurate targeting brighten the public’s perceptions of mobile advertising? It certainly has some potential but something important is missing from this debate. In our own experience of the issue, consumers are worried about more than just the “piss-off factor.” As advertising becomes more closely targeted so it draws more upon personal information. There is a real risk of alienating consumers if they start to feel that advertisers are starting to snoop on their personal lives. When we talk to consumers there is a spectrum of acceptability on this issue. Targeting according to a customer submitted personal profile seems to be fine. Control remains in their hands. Targeting according to customer location receives a more wary reception. Is their location really something that the public wanted in the hands of marketers? When it comes to targeted advertising based on the content of text messages, people really begin to feel uncomfortable. Although there is some variation to how seriously people took the issue, there seems to be a general concensus that some information should be kept private and out of bounds for advertisers. Doubtful of any real benefit to themselves, many consumers are more concerned about their perceived loss of privacy. Of course, all the information needed to make use of these services is already available to mobile operators. But the thought of it being used for advertising really brings that fact home for the consumer. Any company wishing to play a part in mobile advertising should be mindful of this fact. If they don’t treat the issue of privacy with due sensitivity to consumer concerns then they risk losing their customers to a company that does.

2 Comments:

Blogger Sabine said...

I remember researching mobile advertising as a concept way back when we did some future gazing on 3G for Nokia Networks.

What surprised me at the time was how positive people were in general to the IDEA of mobile advertising, especially the level of personalisation it theoretically allowed, making it possible that you'd only get ads for things you were really interested in.

However - this was in the days before Amazon and
Google had properly taken off and provided people with models of how this might be delivered - consumers imagined a mechanism THEY rather than the advertiser would control. In their ideal, they would fill in a questionnaire which would allow them to tick (and untick!) subject areas they would want to receive ads on.

However, control over data (since this is a business blog I won't get into some of the political manifestations) seems to slipping more and more out of consumer into commercial hands without much of an outcry...(think store cards, Oyster cards, CCTV and those microchips that have been trialled in supermarkets).

I agree that people feel uncomfortable about loss of control but I do wonder whether they'll really be voting with their feet because they feel their personal spaces may be violated or whether it won't in fact be the more banal annoyance ('piss off') factor which will be more (de-)motivating?

3:06 PM  
Blogger Nick said...

Fair point - resignation to this kind of thing does seem to have been the pattern in the past. However, with the mobile being a much more personal device than the other sources of data that you mention, I wonder if it might not take people a little longer to adjust to some of the proposed new methods, particularly ads based on the contents of texts.

Also, the attention currently being paid to the release of data from AOL's search logs is helping to rise public awareness of the issue. In my experience, people have only been dimly aware that this data is being collected in many cases.

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/privacy/0,71579-0.html?tw=wn_politics_1

10:55 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home